When writing autobiographies, there is no doubt in my mind that the authors have to write all of their dialogue from memory. But when they are doing this there will, of course, be some gaps or inaccurate parts. When writing dialogue from memory, is accuracy the main focus, or should succinctness and liveliness be the main focus?
Before getting into the essay, if you do not know what succinctness means do not worry, I did not know what it meant until I had to write this essay. Succinctness, or concision, means clear and precise expression in a few words. Now back to the essay.
Like many things, there is no general answer for this answer. In some books, like manuals, you would want accuracy and succinctness. But in an autobiography or novel, you would want liveliness. It is no fun to read a long and boring paragraph full of dialogue. Liveliness is what keeps the reader engaged and interested.
I am not saying accuracy and succinctness are not important, in non-fiction books they are what you are looking for. But in autobiographies, liveliness should be the main focus when writing dialogue.
Thanks for reading!